US supreme court rules Trump has 'absolute immunity' for official acts

[Leroy N. Soetoro]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/supreme-
court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling

The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled to some
degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major victory for Donald
Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case against him and any
prospect of a trial before November.

The court’s conservative majority – which Trump helped create – found 6-3
that presidents were protected from prosecution for official actions that
extended to the “outer perimeter” of his office, but could face charges
for unofficial conduct.
--
We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that
stupid people won't be offended.

Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem. It has none.

No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed
dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.

[David Hartung]

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/supreme-
court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled to some
degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major victory for Donald
Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case against him and any
prospect of a trial before November.
The court’s conservative majority – which Trump helped create – found 6-3
that presidents were protected from prosecution for official actions that
extended to the “outer perimeter” of his office, but could face charges
for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/supreme-
court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled to some
degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major victory for Donald
Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case against him and any
prospect of a trial before November.
The court’s conservative majority – which Trump helped create – found 6-3
that presidents were protected from prosecution for official actions that
extended to the “outer perimeter” of his office, but could face charges
for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely. They did not protect the presidency — they protected
Trump. They obliterated the proposition that no one is above the law.

[Limpieza]

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/suprem
e- court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled
to some degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major
victory for Donald Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case
against him and any prospect of a trial before November.
The court’s conservative majority – which Trump helped create
– found 6-3 that presidents were protected from prosecution for
official actions that extended to the “outer perimeter” of his
office, but could face charges for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely.

Your opinion. Which is worth about as much as one of Joe Biden's poop
filled diapers.

[Scout]

Post by Limpieza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/suprem
e- court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled
to some degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major
victory for Donald Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case
against him and any prospect of a trial before November.
The courtâ?Ts conservative majority â?" which Trump helped create
â?" found 6-3 that presidents were protected from prosecution for
official actions that extended to the â?oouter perimeterâ? of his
office, but could face charges for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely.

Your opinion. Which is worth about as much as one of Joe Biden's poop
filled diapers.

Probably true as far as it goes... it is assumes that Rudy wouldn't put
great value in having Biden's diapers as he does his delusional opinions.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by David Hartung
Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely.

"Cunt Flaps" loves to pretend he knows about the Constitution.




No, the Constitution does *not* say what the government may not do.
- Rudy, stupidly demonstrating his complete ignorance of the
Constitution and claiming the Bill of Rights doesn't exist.
Message-ID: <FN6fL.17220$***@fx10.iad>

[Scout]

Post by Klaus Schadenfreude

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by David Hartung
Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely.

"Cunt Flaps" loves to pretend he knows about the Constitution.

Replace "the Constitution" with "anything".

[Rudy Canoza]

Yep! That certainly is the default, all right! *HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA*!

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by David Hartung
Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely.

Prof. Canoza knows about the Constitution.

That's right, KKKlaun — and you don't.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
"Cunt Flaps" loves to pretend he knows about the Constitution.
No, the Constitution does *not* say what the government may not do.
- Rudy, stupidly demonstrating his complete ignorance of the
Constitution and claiming the Bill of Rights doesn't exist.

That's right, KKKlaun — and I don't.

We know that, "Cunt Flaps."

Now, follow the rules, dwarf!


If you wish to address me, scooter, you will do it in direct reply to
my posts; no piggybacking.
-Rudy, thinking he makes the rules
-Message-ID: <ZZacK.8$***@fx34.iad>

Videos not allowed.
Imaginärer Gruppenleiter Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <atw5M.62534$***@fx09.iad>

This video is allowed under the rules of Usenet, because it is
*supporting* a point, not making it.
-"Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <pygXN.16915$***@fx10.iad>

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

Post by Scout

Post by Klaus Schadenfreude

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by David Hartung
Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely.

"Cunt Flaps" loves to pretend he knows about the Constitution.

Replace "the Constitution" with "anything".

Well, he knows how to make impotent threats. And it would also appear
he's good at getting his Usenet providers yanked out from under him.
He's good at that. Other than that, though....

[Phil Omdahl]

On 02 Jul 2024, Klaus Schadenfreude

Post by Klaus Schadenfreude

cking.dwarf.com...

Post by Klaus Schadenfreude

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by David Hartung
Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely.

"Cunt Flaps" loves to pretend he knows about the Constitution.

Replace "the Constitution" with "anything".

Well, he knows how to make impotent threats. And it would also appear
he's good at getting his Usenet providers yanked out from under him.
He's good at that. Other than that, though....

Rudy's TURD house of cards collapsed in the SCOTUS winds yesterday. It
will take him a few days and lots of 'shrooms to recover.

[Scout]

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/supreme-
court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled to some
degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major victory for Donald
Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case against him and any
prospect of a trial before November.
The court’s conservative majority – which Trump helped create – found 6-3
that presidents were protected from prosecution for official actions that
extended to the “outer perimeter” of his office, but could face charges
for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely. They did not protect the presidency — they
protected Trump. They obliterated the proposition that no one is above the
law.

Except the President is above the law, generally.

[US Constitution]

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/supreme-
court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled to some
degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major victory for Donald
Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case against him and any
prospect of a trial before November.
The court’s conservative majority – which Trump helped create –

found 6-3

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
that presidents were protected from prosecution for official actions that
extended to the “outer perimeter” of his office, but could face

charges

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely. They did not protect the presidency — they

protected

Trump. They obliterated the proposition that no one is above the law.

In other words they treated him like a Democrat?

[Phil Omdahl]

Post by US Constitution

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/supre
me- court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled to some
degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major victory for
Donald Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case against
him and any prospect of a trial before November.
The court’s conservative majority – which Trump
helped create – found 6-3
that presidents were protected from prosecution for official actions that
extended to the “outer perimeter” of his office, but
could face charges
for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely. They did not protect the presidency
— they protected
Trump. They obliterated the proposition that no one is above the law.

In other words they treated him like a Democrat?

Fair is fair. If Hillary Clinton walks for destroying evidence during an
FBI criminal investigation, Trump should get the same consideration.

[Scout]

Post by Phil Omdahl

Post by US Constitution

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/supre
me- court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled to some
degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major victory for
Donald Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case against
him and any prospect of a trial before November.
The courtââ,¬â"¢s conservative majority ââ,¬â?o which Trump
helped create ââ,¬â?o found 6-3
that presidents were protected from prosecution for official actions that
extended to the ââ,¬Å"outer perimeterââ,¬Â of his office, but
could face charges
for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

They fucked it up entirely. They did not protect the presidency
ââ,¬â? they protected
Trump. They obliterated the proposition that no one is above the law.

In other words they treated him like a Democrat?

Fair is fair. If Hillary Clinton walks for destroying evidence during an
FBI criminal investigation, Trump should get the same consideration.

Yep, and she was just a secretary when she did so.

[Mitchell Holman]

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/supreme
- court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled to
some degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major victory
for Donald Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case against
him and any prospect of a trial before November.
The court’s conservative majority – which Trump helped create –
found 6-3 that presidents were protected from prosecution for
official actions that extended to the “outer perimeter” of his
office, but could face charges for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

And a green lightr Biden to
arrest Trump and cancel the upcoming
election. As long as he declares it
to be an "official policy"

[Khil Philed]

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/supreme
- court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled to
some degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major victory
for Donald Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case against
him and any prospect of a trial before November.
The court’s conservative majority – which Trump helped create –
found 6-3 that presidents were protected from prosecution for
official actions that extended to the “outer perimeter” of his
office, but could face charges for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

Agree. It's disgraceful that it had to go there in the first place.

[NoBody]

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/supreme-
court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled to some
degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major victory for Donald
Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case against him and any
prospect of a trial before November.
The court’s conservative majority – which Trump helped create – found 6-3
that presidents were protected from prosecution for official actions that
extended to the “outer perimeter” of his office, but could face charges
for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

Anyone who disagrees with this ruling should answer if we can put
Biden on trial for the deaths of the people he left behind in
Afghanistan.

[Scout]

Post by NoBody

Post by David Hartung

Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/01/supreme-
court-decision-trump-immunity-ruling
The US supreme court has ruled that former presidents are entitled to some
degree of immunity from criminal prosecution, a major victory for Donald
Trump that guts the 2020 election subversion case against him and any
prospect of a trial before November.
The court's conservative majority - which Trump helped create - found
6-3
that presidents were protected from prosecution for official actions that
extended to the "outer perimeter" of his office, but could face charges
for unofficial conduct.

Good for the Supreme Court.

Anyone who disagrees with this ruling should answer if we can put
Biden on trial for the deaths of the people he left behind in
Afghanistan.

I say put him on trial for the classified materials he had, kept and
shared.. we already know THAT is an impeachable offense. The Democrats
showed us that. So they have no grounds to complain with that standard is
applied to Biden who actually did violate the laws on those materials.